This was an essay I did for my half completed psychotherapy degree. Someday I may talk about it, why I think psychotherapy has an end date, but more likely I'll talk about happier things.
Enjoy,
Religious Mania As seen through an Integrative, Multicultural approach utilising Person Centred Therapy and Choice Theory Intro Creating a Working Definition For the purposes of this essay, and namely the type of psychological issue on discussion, the author would firstly like to make a categorical distinction between Religious Mania and Religious Experience. After which we will introduce the theories of Person Centred (PCT) Choice theory (CT) and Multicultural Therapy (MCT).
In addition, a distinction is also required to notate the actual corelates between an example of religious mania and the traditional understanding of religious experiences (Ware, 1993). As we will touch on later, wisdom traditions have been aware of religious mania for some time and have methods to address it (Trungpa, 2002).
For instance, (Bar-El, et al, 2000) notes that while Jerusalem syndrome can be apparent in visitors to Jerusalem with or without a prior psychiatric condition, not all patients identify with a biblical character or deliver a “sermon…based on an unrealistic plea…to adopt a more wholesome, moral, simple way of life,” (pg.88). This reveals a variance in the severity of the mania, and, more interestingly, highlighting a difficulty at labelling what is a pathological experience and what is a benign experience.
Obviously, there is a difference here between a psychiatric condition and an issue that would appear in a counselling room. Hence, for the purposes of this essay, religious mania will be defined as a maladaptive overinterpretation of religious tenants that impinges upon one’s ability to operate in life but is not of a psychiatric nature.
This is an imperfect definition. Given the variety of belief in the counselling world one may consider the definition as too nuanced or too vague. However, it is not as simple to call all religious values as maladaptive, as belief is predictive of commitment within drug recovery programs (Sung, & Chu 2013) and greater psychological wellbeing (Plante, Saucedo, & Rice 2001). Nevertheless, as the early 21st century polemics Dawkins, Harris, and Dennett have noted, albeit poorly (Pigliucci, 2013) and the child abuse scandal have shown, as sociocultural phenomena, religious adherence can lead to abusive and domineering behaviours.
Nevertheless, western centric culture can designate an illiberal behaviour that may also have religious presupposition, such as the wearing of the veil in Islam (Ajrouch, 2007) offering us an insight to how religious expression is seen cross-culturally. Given the rise in the Islamic community in Ireland, rising 96 percent from the years 2006-2016 (CSO, 2020), is it possible to apply a western epistemology that says any discordance with a person’s QWP is a form of mental ill health even if it comes from a religious presupposition (Glasser, 1998). Indeed, as noted by (Sabry &, Vohra, 2013) family is of extreme import in the Islamic faith, meaning outside, or state backed, intervention may not only cause harm to the client but to the family structure itself.
How then can a multicultural therapist offer an intervention where there is a relationship with a family member that is, if not of any criminal intent, causing harm to the client? Furthermore, how does one intervene when this intervention causes fiction against a fundamental belief within an Islamic family relationship?
To give another example. In (Habib, 2013) Conner Habib details the interesting readoption of Christianity through a Queer or LGBTQ lens, notably coalescing around Christ’s revolutionary ideas such as slavery, justice, and forgiveness. If one countenances this movement against the adopted opinion of the traditional church, one could understand how Conservative Nigerian Christians could view a Queer Christianity as a form of religious mania (Ojo, 2005) in that it is a form of satanic, or demonic possession in the extreme few.
Is Religious Mania Manic?Glossolalia, or speaking in tongues, is a phenomenon observed in biblical literature and has been the subject of some psychological research. It is also a significant part of Pentecostal Christianity. Of note to this essay is the following: Glossolalia, a, does not seem to correlate to any malfunctioning of the language centre of the brain (Newberg, Wintering, Morgan, &, Waldman, 2006); b, is not uniquely a psychotic disorder; and, c, may in some individuals be beneficial (Hempel, Meloy, Stern, Ozone, & Gray, 2002).
As westerners, practicing western medicine, how do we operate in this scenario and how do we incorporate spiritual experiences without resorting to terminology such as mania and psychosis? Indeed (Hart, 2012) describes the negative of therapeutic effects interventions can have upon individuals experiencing what could be termed as Religious Mania.
As we will discuss later in this essay, nurturing a client who is experiencing some kind of spiritual experience can be compatible through a Person centred or Choice theory approach, but there does appear to be a cultural reticence at dealing with this issue given the limitations of our western centred, rational locus of evaluation. As Jung notes, a discussion of religious belief is strangely taboo at the dinner table (Jung, 2001) whereas in other communities talk of spirits, magic and the paranormal is quite common. This, it seems, is a personal choice amplified by the general removed nature western society has become from its mystical and religious grounds. But as we will touch on later, an obsession on the platonic form of a reason centred epistemology can not only lead to disastrous consequences for clients (Hart, 2012). It also may create a world where, in the same way Japanese fiction gives energy to the abstraction of a nonhuman female in lieu of the true female (Kawai, 1988), western therapy gives energy to a nonhuman client in lieu of the true client.
However, if religious mania, if it is not a psychiatric disorder, how best can we integrate examples of religious expression without either disregarding our theories or disregarding the experience of our clients?
An Overview and the Intent of this EssayWe have explored how religiosity when expressed in a western worldview can appear to be problematic. For the purposes of this essay we attempt to adopt a positive integrative light on such experiences, being also cognisant of varied cultural epistemologies as well. Furthermore, we will also explore from a psychoanalytic orientation as to the deeper consequences of treating religious experiences when they are hermetically sealed within an integrative model.
The theories: A Brief Overview In this section, we will briefly outlay the basic outlines of PCT, CT, and MCT counselling, with a view to bring our client, Yacob, through the precise therapeutic interventions and theoretical interpretations of personality in the next section.
Person Centred Perhaps the greatest contribution of Carl Rogers to the psychotherapeutic world is the core conditions of congruence, Unconditional Positive Regard and Empathy (Rogers, 1967) these being the foremost conditions that lead, when utilised in a Rogerian model, to psychological change. Whereas psychodynamic theory places great emphasis on the Psyche/soma model of psychological disorders, namely that mental illness as such is the maladaptive adaptation of somatic behaviours rooted in childhood, Roger’s theory emphasised the inbuilt potentiality of a person towards the Good (Rogers, 1957). In essence, it is not by an interpretation of trauma by analysis that “cures” mental illness but through the genuineness of a relationship between client and therapist which, mediated by UPR—which Roger assumes is a requirement that all humans need— “activates” a clients inbuilt ability for self-actualisation.
Choice Theory Choice theory considers therapy from a different, but not entirely foreign, perspective. Glasser says, “we can only control our own behaviour,” (Glasser, 1998, pg.98) and that all behaviour is Total Behaviour comprising of acting, thinking, feeling and felt sensation. For choice theory, mental illness, as such, usually lies at the foot of dysfunctional relationships to others and ourselves (Glasser, 1985) and that behaviours are influenced by the basic needs, survival, fun, love and belonging, freedom and power, or rather attempts to satisfy our quality world picture, the personal Shangri-la (Glasser, 1998). Hence choice theory is far more direct and focused than PCT, with the client’s past actions being secondary to how they are acting in the present, for it is in the present can behaviour change.
Multicultural PsychotherapyIt is not as simple to say that all culture is totally different from each other, but one can argue that when engaging in a western form of psychotherapy it is not as easy to transfer western treatment modalities for mental health as it is for physical health. For example, (Tanaka-Matsumi, 2011) notes that “Latino adults in the United States chose to engage in allocentric (other-oriented) relaxation imagery exercise more frequently than idiocentric (self-oriented) imagery” (pg.277). This gives the reader a brief but hopefully cogent understanding of a single difference between culture, particularly on an issue that appears to be minute. Yet the disparity between self and other, and what these terms mean cross culturally, can present problems in Multicultural Psychotherapy. Therefore, MCT states that all cultural ways of looking at the world are valid; that the counsellor, themselves, is rooted in a culture, and as a result, counselling should be viewed as both a result of and influenced by the wider sociological and cultural strata outside the therapy room (Mcleod, 2016b).
3.0 How best to Understand Yacob: An Integrative Approach Yacob: The Client Yacob is a young man in his late 20s from the Midwest area of the United States. He was brought up catholic but left the faith after entering college. Having studied Security Systems and Analysis and worked in the field for three years, Yacob made contact with a Santo Daime group in the United Kingdom in early 2018 and moved to Ireland with his girlfriend and experimenting with Ayahuasca in Brazil. He is coming to therapy to find himself, and find a new career perspective, but during his first session starts talking about his use of Ayahuasca in Brazil. We will use the ways paradigm as described by (Stewart-Sicking, Deal, & Fox) as the basis for our examination.
Yacob: The Way of Understanding During his therapy Yacob introduces the subject of his adventures with Ayahuasca, notably the so called “visions” he received. He is in part inspired by the experienced, but still has not, in his words, fully integrated the experience.
From a Rogerian viewpoint, notably when we consider the organismic valuing process (Rogers, 1951), one can consider this event as an external control process and could be damaging (Jones, Butman, 2011); the inspiration for his move to Ireland came from the psychoactive and not from an internal valuing process. However, the experience has “activated” his self-actualising tendency in that it has brought him to seek therapy, which as noted by Roger’s is the tendency within all humans to strive towards the good (Rogers, 1967).
Using choice theory, the Ayahuasca experience is not the focus of this analysis. Humans have control over their behaviour and not their past (Wubbolding, 2015b). However, what is revealed is Yaacob’s relationship with his girlfriend, who has also taken Ayahuasca. Unlike Yacob she had no experience when she consumed the psychoactive. This has been causing fiction in the relationship, as she is finding Yacob distant and in the clouds and he has felt the spark in the relationship dim. Here we can see that Yaacob’s “religious experience/mania” has caused a discord in both Yaacob’s and his girlfriend’s Quality World Picture (Glasser, 1985; 1999) in that Ayahuasca is present in one and absent in the other. Further still, we could propose that while his girlfriend’s basic need of love and belonging is being undermined by Yaacob’s behaviour, Yaacob’s overreliance on his power need is getting in the way of his relationship.
It is obvious that Yaacob is still in love with his girlfriend, and still wishes to stay with her. As the conversation deepens, we learn that Yaacob’s has not been in contact with his father since he renounced his catholic beliefs in college. Here, one could propose a similar pattern in the way Yaacob is behaving to his girlfriend if a less extreme example. Given his father’s adherence to his beliefs, we can assume that Yaacob’s current relationship problems is a consequence of his upbringing in a strong, conservative part of the USA (Mcleod 2016b) However, it has been noted that religious adherence is, “associated with optimism and low anxiety,” but that, “a high degree of religious faith (is) was un-related to self-righteousness and social desirability,” (Plante, Saucedo, & Rice 2001, pg 411). Therefore, in this instance this assumption is not born out by the empirical evidence.
When we integrate these theories, one arrives at three separate conclusions as to the actual cause of his religious mania. Hence, from an integrative viewpoint, in this instance, it is better to use PCT CT and MCT as different diagnostic tools to get to the underlining cause of why Yaacob has come to therapy.
Yacob: Way of BeingFor Rogers, the cause of mental friction is the incongruence between a client’s self-concept and their ideal self. Furthermore, (Rogers, 1967) notes that conditions of worth, the factors (good or bad) that the clients absorbed from childhood that it believes correlates with its ideal self, are also extremely important. They construct, simply, the latent self-concept. For Yaacob, his conditions of worth are in a negative state given his religious mania. Yet, this was not always the case, and he reports a substantive and warm childhood.
One could argue here that Yaacob’s way of being, from a PCT perspective, is in discordance with his ideal self in that he is not getting the positive regard he got from his father as a child (Mcleod, 2016), that relationship being a positive condition of worth that was of benefit to him as a child. As Rogers notes, “when an individual discriminates himself as satisfying another's need for positive regard, he necessarily experiences satisfaction of his own need for positive regard.” (Rogers, 1959. pg.232) Therefore his need of religious belief is a factor of his childhood relationship with his father, who would bring him to church every Sunday.
The choice theory viewpoint would again focus on how Yaacob is acting in the here and now, building on the PCT interpretation of Yaacob’s conditions of worth. According to (Larry, 2013, pg. 43) “people who do not have their needs fulfilled…may turn to negative and destructive activities.” Could Yaacob’s need for love and belonging be a consequence of his father’s paternal religiosity, which was disrupted by his entry into college? While it may not be true to say that Yaacob’s religious mania was caused by his Ayahuasca experience, the coming home to a spiritual exercise could be an attempt to regain his basic need for love of his father. Hence, Yaacob, within a psychoactive induced experience, is feeling in accordance with his QWP, but is not thinking or acting in a manner that is creating good relationships, which is what Glasser notes is a primary cause of mental disturbance (Glasser, 1998)
Adopting a worldview that incorporates different types of treatment modalities allows a MC therapist to comprehend Yaacob’s current belief view. For instance, its been observed that incenses and ointments brunt in Jewish Christian religious ceremonies have “a broad range of enzyme inhibitors and psychoactive components with mood-altering…properties” (Nemu, 2019, pg.127), indicating that there is some synergy between Yaacob’s Ayahuasca experimentation and his traditional catholic upbringing; namely the rights of passages of the catholic sacraments. A MC therapist can also interpret Yaacob’s Religious Mania, or over committal to his Ayahuasca experience, as a form of spiritual materialism (Trungpa, 2002); this being where a client co-opts “spiritual meanings and practices in the service of the material life of the self” (Gould, 2006, pg.65)
Yacob: Way of Intervening For the PCT therapist, and in simple terms, therapy is the application of the core conditions which allow the client’s organismic valuing process to orientate themselves through a positive locus of evaluation (Rogers,1959; Mcleod, 2016). The therapist should not judge or contradict Yaacob’s religious experience; one could argue that the experience is positive as it connects Yaacob to his father. Indeed, during the therapy, Yaacob lets slip that his girlfriend “kinda already figure that out,” indicating that he is aware that his experience, while important to him, is out vetoed by his broken relationship to his partner.
Again, choice theory can be integrated into this reasoning too. While (Glasser, 1998) would not focus, in the session, on the Ayahuasca experience, CT would focus on Yaacob’s current behaviour (Wubbolding, 2015). Namely, the religious mania, which, as offered above, is an inflation of a spiritual experience with one’s self-worth (Trungpa, 2002). Indeed, while CT is a purely behavioural therapy, the therapist’s interpretation that Yaacob could be obsessing over the Ayahuasca while concurrently disintegrating his relationship with his girlfriend. Indeed if Yaacob’s need for Love and belonging is the cause of his attachment to the experience of Ayahuasca, his goal should be his need for love and belonging (Glasser, 2005) and it would follow that the therapist and Yaacob would strategize how to reconnect with his father (Glasser, 1998).
In choice Theory (Glasser, 1998) and Person Centred (Rogers, 1957, 1959, 1967) the idea of external control is of extreme import; the proper functioning of an individual comes from being guided by the I and not the other. However, we must be cognisant of the limitation of CT and PCT’s explanatory power. Furthermore, in treating Yacob through a MC lens we must be deeply aware that he is still a religious individual and, after pursing a reunification with his father, still pursues his worship albeit without fixation upon the Ayahuasca experience. It is also worth mentioning that the wisdom traditions notably Buddhism (Trungpa, 2002) and Christianity (Ware, 1993) have methods of dealing with what Buddhism would call spiritual materialism or what may be described as Glossolalia (Hempel, et al, 2002). While it is beyond the reach of a MC therapist to possess God like omniscience in intrinsic detail pertaining to all religious, cultural, and mystical forms of healing, one final observation in the case of Yaacob could be that, within the proper theological setting, under the right guidance, his religious mania may not have spiralled out of control. The question that follows for all MC therapist to ask is can they, or should they, replicate this type of spiritual mentorship?
The Strengths and Weaknesses of this Approach Strengths What is of note, from an integrative perspective, is the ability for each theory to support the other. While CT and PCT place diverse emphasis on the treatment within the session—(Glasser, 1998) would note that humour and the present moment are at the foremost for example—both theories were able to highlight the maladaptive nature of religious experience. Indeed, the external nature of the experience was masking what was, we could postulate, an inherent childhood condition of worth. A Freudian view would support this, albeit designating the attraction towards religious beliefs “an illusion…little more than a symptom of alienated needs,” (Kirsner, 2006, pg. 361)
We can go further and say by the amalgamation of CT/PCT and MCT through an integrated model gives therapists several explanatory tools to diagnosis and treat clients, whereas a psychoanalytical viewpoint is limited a, by its time and b, by its treatment modalities. Indeed, Integral Theory, as espoused by Ken Wilber (Wilber, 2005) is one such example of how taking a multidiscipline view can offer a particular perspective that is not limited by the epistemological frame inherent in any one theory. Indeed, an understanding into the auspices of spiritual materialism was key in helping Yaacob see past his religious mania/religious experience.
WeaknessThere is however a problem with this integratory field, namely its assumption that the human being is oriented towards Good. Indeed, as (Freud, 1963) observed, the ego is not the master of its own house let alone is a civilisation the master of its own soul. Although Yaacob was able to realise that it was his father’s love that was missing, CT, for instance, was limited by its fixation on the future. It was never revealed why Yaacob broke with his father, as it is only an assumption that the fracture occurred because Yaacob lost his faith during his college years. From a psychoanalytical point of view, if a condition of worth is based upon a shared religious faith then is that not a factor of external control? If through PCT, Yaacob returned to this relationship because it is a positive condition of worth, where does the girlfriend fit into the equation? Indeed, one could offer the interpretation that the religious mania is a neurosis, and the integrative model facilitated a regression back to the father figure (Sandler, & Sandler, 1994).
There is also the question of Yaacob’s finding himself? Is this a function of his behaviour, or is it the result of his organismic valuing process? How in this integrative system is homeostasis measured? Further still, the focusing on Yaacob’s childhood left open his relationship to his mother. Why is it that he never mentioned her?
The Most Basic of NeedsTo return to Yaacob’s girlfriend, where is she now in this integrative model given that Yaacob has replaced her with his father? Following a conceptual image of bliss, or wherever the organismic valuing process leads to, may be a form of “healing” but what about the other? One of the failings of this integrative excessive was addressing the girlfriend’s, and Yaacob’s basic desires. In other words, Yaacob’s sexual partnership with her.
One must wonder if the integrative model lacks this basic aspect of human biology, namely that the conditions of worth and the QWP are rooted in human sexuality and not it within them. One cannot overlook basic instincts and replace them as being secondary to a QWP or an organismic valuing process. To quote (Lamarre, 2006, “The solution to the constituent lack of human sexuality is Platonic sex, that is…sex with images, a kind of safe sex in which people don’t touch…a play with surfaces” (pg.58).
This is not to say that CT and PCT lack explanatory power. This essay gives one such example as to how both can be utilised to bring a troubled soul home, and the speculation above is still conjecture. However, humans are biological entities first and foremost, not just behaviours and not just oriented towards good.
Conclusion While, as expressed above, there are problems with the integrative model, it was noted that a greater awareness of multicultural ideas was paramount in conceptualising the root of Yaacob’s religious mania/experience. Uniquely, CT and PCT were able to bring to awareness Yaacob’s conditions of worth which and set him on a better path, reconciliation with his father. PCT and CT worked successfully with each other, aiding each other and highlighted a possible framework whereby PCT and CT can serve as worthwhile theories of integration.
Ajrouch, K. J. (2007). Global contexts and the veil: Muslim integration in the United States and France. Sociology of religion, 68(3), 321-325.
Bar-El, Y., Durst, R., Katz, G., Zislin, J., Strauss, Z., & Knobler, H. Y. (2000). Jerusalem syndrome. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 176(1), 86-90.
CSO, (2020). Religion - Non-Christian - CSO - Central Statistics Office. [online] Cso.ie. Available at: <https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-cp8iter/p8iter/p8rnc/> [Accessed 1 December 2020].
Freud, S. (1963). Introductory lectures on psychoanalysis, part III. In: J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 16, pp. 1-476). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1917)
Glasser, W. (1985). Control theory: A new explanation of how we control our lives. Perennial Library.
(1998).Choice theory: A new psychology of personal freedom. Harper Perennial.
(2005). Defining mental health as a public health problem: A new leadership role for the helping professions. William Glasser Incorporated
Gould, S. J. (2006). Cooptation through conflation: Spiritual materialism is not the same as spirituality. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 9(1), 63-78.
Habib, C. (2013). Queer Christ: A Primer on LGBT Theology. Vice.com. Retrieved 2 December 2020, from
https://www.vice.com/en/article/bn5zad/queer-christ-lgbt-theology.
Hart, D. (2012). Therapeutic Superstition. Retrieved 3 December 2020, from
https://www.firstthings.com/article/2012/11/therapeutic-superstitionHempel, A. G., Meloy, J. R., Stern, R., Ozone, S. J., & Gray, B. T. (2002). Fiery Tongues and Mystical Motivations: Glossolalia in a Forensic Population is Associated with Mania and Sexual/Religious Delusions. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 47(2), 15248J.
https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs15248jJung, C. G. (2001). Modern man in search of a soul. Psychology Press.
Wilber, K. (2005). Introduction to integral theory on practice spring. AQAL Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 1(1), 1–38.
https://redfrogcoaching.com/uploads/3/4/2/1/34211350/ken_wilber_introduction_to_integral.pdfKawai, H. (1990). The Japanese Psyche: Major Motifs in the Fairy Tales of Japan, trans. Hayao Kawai and Sachiko Reece. Dallas: Spring Publications
Kirsner, D. (2006). Freud , Civilization , Religion , and Stoicism. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(2), 354–366.
Lary, B. K. (2013). Explaining Glasser’s “Quality World.” International Journal of Choice Theory and Reality Therapy, 33(1), 44–50.
Lamarre, T. (2006). Platonic sex: Perversion and shôjo anime (Part one). Animation, 1(1), 45–59.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1746847706065841Mcleod, J. (2016). Theory and practice of the person- centred approach. In An Introduction to Counselling (Fifth Edit, Issue 2013, pp.165–201). Open University Press.
(2016b). Multiculturalism as an Approach to Counselling. In An Introduction to Counselling (Fifth Edit, Issue 2013, pp. 241–269). Open University Press.
Nemu, D. (2019). Getting high with the most high: Entheogens in the Old Testament. Journal of Psychedelic Studies, 3(2), 117-132.
Newberg, A. B., Wintering, N. A., Morgan, D., & Waldman, M. R. (2006). The measurement of regional cerebral blood flow during glossolalia: a preliminary SPECT study. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 148(1), 67-71.
Ojo, M. A. (2005, June). Religion and sexuality: Individuality, choice and sexual rights in Nigerian Christianity. In Understanding Human Sexuality Seminar Series (Vol. 4, pp. 1-15).
Pigliucci, M. (2013). New Atheism and the scientistic turn in the atheism movement. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 37, 142-153.
Plante, T. G., Saucedo, B., & Rice, C. (2001). The association between strength of religious faith and coping with daily stress. Pastoral Psychology, 49(4), 291–300.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004819505286Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of consulting psychology, 21(2), 95.
(1959). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (ed.). Psychology: A study of science. (pp. 184-256). N.Y.: McGraw Hill.
(1967). On becoming a person: a therapist's view of psychotherapy. London: Constable
Sandler, J., & Sandler, A.-M. (1994). Regression and Anti-Regression. Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis;, 2(1), 119–132.
Sabry, W. M., & Vohra, A. (2013). Role of Islam in the management of psychiatric disorders. Indian journal of psychiatry, 55(Suppl 2), S205.
Schmid, J, T. (2013). Healing with Ayahuasca: Noteson Therapeutic Rituals and Effectsin European Patients Treating Their Diseases. In Labate, B. C., & Cavnar, C. (Eds.), The therapeutic use of ayahuasca. (pp.74-93). Springer Science & Business Media.
Stewart-Sicking, J. A., Deal, P. J., & Fox, J. (2017). The Ways Paradigm: A Transtheoretical Model for Integrating Spirituality Into Counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 95(2), 234–241.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12135Sung, H. E., & Chu, D. C. (2013). The varieties of religious experience and the retention of clients in Taiwanese faith-based residential drug user treatment. Substance Use & Misuse, 48(12), 1219-1232.
Tanaka-Matsumi, J. (2011). Culture and Psychotherapy: Searching for an Empirically Supported Relationship. In K. D. Keith (Ed.), Cross-cultural Psychology. Contemporary Themes and Perspectives. (p. 596). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Trungpa, C. (2002). Cutting through spiritual materialism. Berkeley, US: Shambhala Publications.
Ware, T. (1993). The Orthodox Church: an introduction to eastern Christianity. Penguin. UK.
Wubbolding, R. E. (2015). The Voice of William Glasser: Accessing the Continuing Evolution of Reality Therapy. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 37(3), 189–205.
https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.37.3.01Wubbolding, R. E. (2015b). Reality therapy training manual. 16th revision. Cincinnati, OH: Center for Reality Therapy.